A best practice approach to staff supervision issues


Posted on July 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

|Martin Wigg reflects on legal and practical staff issues| In an earlier article I posed the question of what constitutes best practice and concluded that there was no extant definition. Care homes remain bereft of clarification of what constitutes best practice in respect of staff supervision and all other subjects. The National Minimum Standard 36 states that care staff should receive formal supervision at least six times a year and that supervision covers: all aspects of practice; philosophy of care; and career development needs. (NB The Standards Glossary defines “Staff” as being a “Person working for pay within or from the home, full time, part time, casual or contract” ­ for the purposes of supervision the term “Staff” therefore applies to both qualified nurses and care assistants.) The well known letter from former health minister Jacqui Smith to NCSC chairperson Anne Parker stated that a Standard was not enforceable unless it was directly linked to the Care Home Regulations. In respect of staff super





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

A weary sense of deja vu

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

So we are to be favoured with a Green Paper sometime next summer.

Theresa May’s insistence on the importance of an...

It’s a hard, hard world

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A recent survey has found that 63% of the general public believe the NHS provides social care and 42% think...

Sign-up and pay, or perhaps pay more

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

There are powerful arguments why carers working at night in small specialist care facilities should be paid their full hourly...