A legal miscellany

Posted on December 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

A number of legal cases of general interest within the care sector were decided in the latter part of 2005. In Burke _v_ General Medical Council (GMC) the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the GMC, holding that guidance in relation to the withdrawal of treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, was not unlawful. Where a competent patient required artificial nutrition and hydration in order to continue to live, and wanted it, the doctors had to provide it and a refusal to do so would amount to murder (as well as a breach of duty). On the facts of this particular case, Mr Burke would have the capacity to indicate his continuing wish to receive artificial nutrition and hydration until the last stages of his illness; once that point was reached, artificial nutrition and hydration would not be capable of prolonging his life and he was clear that once that stage was reached, he did not want artificial nourishment to continue. The Court of Appeal stated that there was no basis in the GMC’s guidance

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

Extracare – the next best solution?

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Academics at Newcastle University say that an average of almost nine thousand more care home beds will be needed each...

Care homes discounted in end of life care

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

I am sure that we all want those who we care for to experience ‘a good death’ when the time...

Perhaps I’m ‘app’athetic

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

I’ve got an app in my toolbox that allows me to bang-in nails – I call it a hammer. I’ve...