A single view of quality

Posted on February 8th, by geoff in CT blog. 2 comments

By Caring Times editor Geoff Hodgson

“Quality in a service or product is not what you put into it. It is what the client or customer gets out of it.” – Peter Drucker

“You can’t inspect quality into a care home.” – Chris Vellenoweth, former head of of the former National Association of Inspection and Regulation Officers (NAIRO)

In its current consultation document Shaping the future, the Care Quality Commission, in setting out its vision for the future regulation of health and social care, includes among its seven main themes, its wish to implement a single view of quality – a single shared system of measurement that supports providers to easily monitor their own quality and share information about their performance.

I don’t think it’s going to manage this. ‘Quality’, is just as hard to pin down as other abstract nouns such as ‘love’ and ‘morality’. Quality is very hard to measure; for example, a care worker may have no formal qualifications but deliver excellent care for all that, and it works the other way as well.

Perhaps CQC should lower its sights and go for a commonly recognised set of measurable standards (National Minimum Standards?) which will create the conditions in which high quality care has the best chance of thriving. It has been shown to be difficult enough to achieve consensus on minimum standards without muddying the waters by bringing ‘quality’ (which is essentially perceptual and experiential) into the debate.

  • The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.

2 responses to “A single view of quality”

  1. QUALITY ALWAYS SELLS is as true as true can get. However, to produce a quality product or service one has to decline to be beaten down on price by dutch auctions.

  2. John Burton says:

    Add this to Drucker’s quality quote: “There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all,” and we have a summary of why CQC can never work for residents of care homes and the public. But this useless, expensive, and destructive bureaucracy continues with the grudging toleration of the majority of the social care Establishment. Why?

Latest blog posts

It’s a hard, hard world

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A recent survey has found that 63% of the general public believe the NHS provides social care and 42% think...

Sign-up and pay, or perhaps pay more

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

There are powerful arguments why carers working at night in small specialist care facilities should be paid their full hourly...

The parallel universes of social care

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

The Care Quality Commission’s adult social care ‘productivity’ dipped in August and for the umpteenth time the 90% target of...