Dual registration – a death knell


Posted on January 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

|To increase occupancy, many nursing home owners have considered registering beds for residential care. Ian Holden argues that, under present trading conditions, dual registration is likely to be a recipe for failure.| In my last article (CT, January 2001) I demonstrated the levels at which a typical 40-bed nursing home would have needed to trade in the year 1999-2000 to survive in the long term. It became clear that if average fees had been below £340 per week, survival became very difficult unless average occupancies exceeded 85%. It also explained the difficulties which had arisen where NHP had entered into sale and leaseback arrangements: reflecting a 10.8% return on a notional capital investment of £1.2 million. It follows that the typical dual registered home or “single care home”, with an assumed spilt of 50/50 nursing/residential beds, is unsustainable in future ­ given the staffing requirements demanded by registering authorities, and assuming a substantial proportion of state-aided patients. Even





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

A job in care – what’s it worth?

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

While the Cavendish Coalition, with formidable representation of both the NHS and private social care sector, lobbies to protect the...

End of life care – care homes can do it well

By guest blogger Professor Keri Thomas,

Clinical director, National GSF Centre for End of Life Care

News that care homes could, based on current trends, overtake...

The DTOCs dashboard dilemma

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The Department of Health refers to delayed transfers of care – the issue of people not being able to move...