Dual registration – a death knell


Posted on January 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

|To increase occupancy, many nursing home owners have considered registering beds for residential care. Ian Holden argues that, under present trading conditions, dual registration is likely to be a recipe for failure.| In my last article (CT, January 2001) I demonstrated the levels at which a typical 40-bed nursing home would have needed to trade in the year 1999-2000 to survive in the long term. It became clear that if average fees had been below £340 per week, survival became very difficult unless average occupancies exceeded 85%. It also explained the difficulties which had arisen where NHP had entered into sale and leaseback arrangements: reflecting a 10.8% return on a notional capital investment of £1.2 million. It follows that the typical dual registered home or “single care home”, with an assumed spilt of 50/50 nursing/residential beds, is unsustainable in future ­ given the staffing requirements demanded by registering authorities, and assuming a substantial proportion of state-aided patients. Even





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

Shuffling to some purpose – or just fancy footwork?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

Spare a thought if you will for the hard pressed people who have to update government information. Well into 2018, for...

Life support for the NHS

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

To outline a comprehensive remedy for the ongoing and worsening woes of the beleaguered NHS would take a little more...

A flight of festive fancy

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Christmas Past: It’s cold outside but inside the care home the star atop the tree beams its rays of hope...