Funding shortfall leaves self-funders filling £1.3bn gap


Posted on January 31st, by geoff in Caring Times. Comments Off on Funding shortfall leaves self-funders filling £1.3bn gap

Self-funding, or private-pay, care home residents are keeping the sector afloat according to the latest figures from healthcare market intelligence provider LaingBuisson.

The latest update to its Care Cost Benchmarks toolkit has found that the average fee per resident paid to care homes falls short of the real costs of service provision by more than £100 a week – a situation which means that those residents who pay from their own finances are filling a funding gap of £1.3bn a year.

Headline figures from the toolkit show that residential care homes in England for older people, which employ average levels of staff at average pay rates, currently need to charge fees of between £648 and £590 per week in order to generate a reasonable annual return on capital (set at 11% in the Care Cost Benchmarks model, a level LaingBuisson says is appropriate for a moderately risky business). The higher figure reflects the fee level required for new premises, while the lower is for premises which do no more than pass basic regulatory standards.

Actual fees being paid by councils, however, compare poorly with these levels. According to LaingBuisson analysis of NHS Digital returns, the costs borne by English councils for residential care of older people in independent sector care homes including council overheads stood at just £534 per week in 2015/16. After stripping out those overheads, and projecting forwards, LaingBuisson estimates that average fee paid by English councils for residential care of older people was just £486 per week in 2016/17 – £104 per week below the ‘floor’ level of the Care Cost Benchmarks.

Commenting on the figures, LaingBuisson founder and creator of the Care Cost Benchmarks toolkit William Laing said the adoption of the National Living Wage and requirements to employ more care workers to support residents with increasingly complex dependencies had fuelled an ‘inexorable rise’ in care home costs.

“Most councils responsible for supporting publicly funded residents do not have the budgets to pay a reasonable cost for care and despite councils’ freedom to raise further funds from the Social Care Precept, the situation is unlikely to change in 2017/18,” said Mr Laing.

“The entire care home sector for older people is being kept afloat through cross subsidies from the 40% of care home residents who pay privately. We have conservatively estimated the shortfall in council paid care home fees at about £1.3bn a year in England alone, being the difference between what councils actually pay in care home fees and what they would pay if Care Cost Benchmark rates were applied to the existing mix of homes.

“The £1.3 billion can equally be viewed as a hidden ‘care tax’ that government and councils are content to see private payers contributing to keep mixed funding homes in business. This ‘care tax’ equates to about £8,000 a year on average per privately paying care home resident. Moreover, in all probability it will take another step upwards in April 2017 as care home owners seek to recover increased costs.”

This latest update to the care cost toolkit introduces two new features:

  • For the first time, users can view all care cost benchmarks down to county and unitary authority level, and in the case of larger counties, even further down to district council level;
  • Also for the first time, users can see projected care cost benchmarks for the next financial year, 2017/18, based on known National Living Wage rates and the application of official inflation indices for other care home costs.

LaingBuisson’s Care Cost Benchmarks – eighth edition is available now priced at £1,160 for year long access to the interactive Excel spreadsheet toolkit and a digital Explanatory Guide. To find out more visit www.laingbuisson.com





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

Delayed discharge oversight holds promise

By guest blogger BOB FERGUSON

Although post-Budget celebrations have been understandably muted, social care providers might derive some consolation from the Chancellor’s sub-text. The improvement measures...

Not wishing to seem ungrateful, but . . .

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

The great and the good have comprehensively welcomed the extra £2bn over three years of our money which...

Mixed provision in a mixed retirement market

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A man recently wrote to my local paper objecting to retirement units being built near to the centre of...