It ain’t necessarily so – a call for a change of heart from government


Posted on July 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

For the last couple of decades, during both Conservative and Labour governments, care homes have been subject to an endless quest for certainty. Politicians, policy makers and senior managers use the word “ensure” when what they really mean is “we’ll try to make it happen”. The belief is that bad practice can be eliminated by edicts and rules, and that good practice can be prescribed by policy. A care home is a living organism – a “social ecology” – made up of people and their complex, unpredictable and changing interactions (relationships) and a building with its furniture and equipment. Homes flourish when the conditions for growth and survival are right; they can’t be made to work well. The home exists within, as part of, and dependent on, the wider community. Care homes serve a purpose for society; without them, there would be social breakdown. Since its inception, the Welfare State has depended on the existence of care homes. On the face of it, the idea of a care home is a good one. At various points in





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

It’s a hard, hard world

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A recent survey has found that 63% of the general public believe the NHS provides social care and 42% think...

Sign-up and pay, or perhaps pay more

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

There are powerful arguments why carers working at night in small specialist care facilities should be paid their full hourly...

The parallel universes of social care

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

The Care Quality Commission’s adult social care ‘productivity’ dipped in August and for the umpteenth time the 90% target of...