It ain’t necessarily so – a call for a change of heart from government


Posted on July 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

For the last couple of decades, during both Conservative and Labour governments, care homes have been subject to an endless quest for certainty. Politicians, policy makers and senior managers use the word “ensure” when what they really mean is “we’ll try to make it happen”. The belief is that bad practice can be eliminated by edicts and rules, and that good practice can be prescribed by policy. A care home is a living organism – a “social ecology” – made up of people and their complex, unpredictable and changing interactions (relationships) and a building with its furniture and equipment. Homes flourish when the conditions for growth and survival are right; they can’t be made to work well. The home exists within, as part of, and dependent on, the wider community. Care homes serve a purpose for society; without them, there would be social breakdown. Since its inception, the Welfare State has depended on the existence of care homes. On the face of it, the idea of a care home is a good one. At various points in





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

Inconstant gardeners

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last Saturday was fine and dry so I managed to put in a few hours on our allotment. Not...

When the chips go down . . .

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

I have heard people say they couldn’t get by without their smartphone, and I suppose this must be true...

Loneliness behind the front doors

By Guest Blogger KEITH LEWIN

Last week SCIE issued its monthly ‘Briefing for Commissioners’, its focus is on social isolation which it correctly says “can...