Nine per cent – out of the blue and into the red
By Caring Times editor Geoff Hodgson
A few months ago I was telephoned by a man who owns an 18-bed care home in Derbyshire. Relying almost entirely on local authority placements he said his profit amounted to a little over £40 per bed per week, and he speculated about how much longer he would be able to carry on.
I hope he calls me again because I would like to ask him for his reaction to the 9% increase in registration fees proposed by the Care Quality Commission. I’m sure that if his local authority were to propose a 9% increase in his fees, he would view CQC’s proposed impost with equanimity, but that isn’t going to happen.
What is likely to happen is that his operating costs are going to continue to creep upwards, with a looming increase in the National Minimum Wage threatening to push many care homes across the viability threshold. Now along comes CQC, which from top to bottom pays wages that are somewhat higher than the National Minimum Wage, proposing to trouser another 9% from care home owners in registration fees.
Nowhere in the CQC consultation document can I find any reference to a care home’s capacity to pay, or of any awareness of capacity issues resulting from potential closures.
‘Self-serving’ has become a term often associated with the social care regulator and this proposed 9% increase does nothing to weaken the association.
- The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.