Personalisation’s progress: performance patchy


Posted on November 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

JEF SMITH examines how the ‘personalisation agenda’, along with direct payments and individul budgets, currently causing much head-scratching in the social care sector, might be taken up by the NHS.

Social care is often treated by the Department of Health as little more than a poor relation of the NHS. This is already clear, for example, from the appointments of commissioners and senior staff to the new Care Quality Commission, with four directors appointed from similar posts at the Healthcare Commission but none from the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Then there is the long standing budgetary disparity, health services having enjoyed unprecedented growth rates over the last decade while care has had to make do with the much more constrained level of investment provided for local government. And when it comes to staff, there is simply no comparison between the salaries and status of health professionals on the one hand and most care workers on the other. Seamlessness may be the objective, but one half of the resulting garment looks rich, the other distinctly ragged.

So it comes as some surprise to find personalisation, an idea which has been pioneered in the social services, now being taken





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

End of life care – care homes can do it well

By guest blogger Professor Keri Thomas,

Clinical director, National GSF Centre for End of Life Care

News that care homes could, based on current trends, overtake...

The DTOCs dashboard dilemma

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The Department of Health refers to delayed transfers of care – the issue of people not being able to move...

From where I stand . . .

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A group of residents’ families have criticised the Care Quality Commission’s refusal to review the ‘good’ rating it awarded to...