Providers step up to the mark on National Living Wage


Posted on September 29th, by geoff in Caring Times. Comments Off on Providers step up to the mark on National Living Wage

Young care workers benefit from boost in pay

Four in five young social care workers previously paid below the new National Living Wage (NLW) introduced this April have enjoyed a pay rise as a result of it despite no legal entitlement, according to a report by the independent think tank Resolution Foundation.

The report, which provides the first detailed evidence of how a sector has implemented the NLW, says its implementation in care encouraging so far, but risks faltering if public funding is not increased.

According to the Resolution Foundation, social care employers have overwhelmingly passed on the benefit of the new rate for the over-24s to younger workers, with 83% of young workers previously paid below it seeing their hourly pay increased to or beyond £7.20.

There were also wider ‘knock-on’ benefits of the NLW in the social care sector beyond the lowest paid. Looking at pay improvements during April-July 2016 across the workforce as a whole, care providers invested more than twice as much in raising pay than if they had only satisfied NLW requirements and nothing more. Though some of this was be due to normal pay uprating, this signals the ‘spillover’ effects from the NLW that the Resolution Foundation and the Office for Budget Responsibility predicted.

Despite the big pay boost, the report finds no evidence to suggest that employers have handled the wage increase by cutting workers’ shifts. Average hours for social care workers previously paid below the NLW have risen very slightly since its introduction (by 1.1 per cent), slightly faster than the increase for higher-paid workers (0.5 per cent).

‘Bunching’

While there are many encouraging signs in the care sector’s approach to NLW implementation, the Foundation highlights increased ‘bunching’ of pay in social care at the legal wage floor as a cause for concern.

Despite the evidence of ‘spillover’ benefits, one third of the care workforce is now paid the top adult rate of £7.20, up from one quarter when the top adult NMW rate was £6.50.

This bunching, says the report, means limited opportunities to progress within the sector, and increases the risk of non-compliance when time not covered by contracted pay rates (for example, when travelling between clients) but legally covered by the minimum wage is accounted for.

Funding constraint

With the extra cost of the NLW in social care set to reach £2.3bn by 2020, the ability of the social care sector to continue to spread the benefits in the way it has so far will be limited.

The Foundation says that the solution should not be to row back on the policy. Rather, it calls on the Government to ensure that there are sufficient funds for care providers to continue to implement the NLW without adverse consequences for workers; to recruit and retain the staff needed to meet the demands of an ageing population; and to allow for progression opportunities.

“It is great news that the National Living Wage has had a large positive impact on pay in social care, giving hundreds of thousands of frontline care workers a pay rise, with no evidence of hours being cut to foot the bill,” said Laura Gardiner, senior research and policy analyst at the Resolution Foundation.

“It is encouraging that younger workers have also benefited from the new 25-and-over rate, despite having no legal entitlement to the National Living Wage. In fact, across the age range social care employers are clearly doing much more than the bare minimum where pay is concerned, with the average pay rise double what it would have been had bosses just increased pay to the legal wage floor.

“As the NLW continues to rise to its target value by 2020 we risk reaching a ‘crunch point’ where a lack of funding leaves the care sector unable to continue to spread the benefits of the NLW. Our ageing population, combined with the prospects of reduced inward migration post-Brexit make it essential that more public funding is available for care providers to attract and retain the care workforce we need.”

 





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

Money Can’t Buy Me Care

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Every so often someone writing a speech or press release trots out the tired old trope about “older people receiving...

Building true communities

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Nightingale House, a care home in South London, is soon to include a children’s nursery on the same site; the...

Telling it like it is

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

With accustomed dismay I monitored the media’s response to the Care Quality Commission’s recently published ‘State of Social Care’...