Shouldn¹t we go back to our roots?

Posted on January 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

|The implications of free NHS nursing care could run wider than the impact on self-funders¹ savings. Bob Ferguson explains.| You¹ve probably noticed how commentators writing about the Government¹s flagship policy on the funding of registered nurse care in nursing homes tend to enclose the word “free” in inverted commas, a device that¹s intended to convey a measure of uncertainty, not to say cynicism, about the claim that it is truly cost free. These feelings are well founded. Although the point of reference is usually the recipient of care, I would argue that the pressures on service commissioners are likely to have more long-term significance. Then there¹s the non-financial costs, the shock waves from which might yet buffet the representative sector of the industry into some long-overdue self-examination. For nursing homes, the implementation of free NHS care is only the thin end of a fairly substantial wedge. Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) are about to emerge as major players in service commissioning and v

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

It’s a hard, hard world

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A recent survey has found that 63% of the general public believe the NHS provides social care and 42% think...

Sign-up and pay, or perhaps pay more

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

There are powerful arguments why carers working at night in small specialist care facilities should be paid their full hourly...

The parallel universes of social care

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

The Care Quality Commission’s adult social care ‘productivity’ dipped in August and for the umpteenth time the 90% target of...