Supervision: does regulation promote ‘best practice’?

Posted on October 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

The Care Standards Act Regulations (18 (2) (a)) state that “persons working at the care home are appropriately supervised”, and the National Minimum Standards (36) interprets this as being “Care staff receive formal supervision at least six times a year”. Inspection officers appear to be operating to a policy that requires them to examine supervision notes in order to determine whether compliance is being observed. This presents us with several problems: Firstly does Standard 36 truly reflect the intention of the Regulation? I don’t think so, if it is remembered that the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) Regulations state that staff may be employed if the POVA First Clearance has been obtained, providing that the staff are supervised. This clearly does not mean formal supervision as delineated in the NMS, so I argue that Standard 36 is not enforceable because it does not reflect the Regulation and is merely recommended best practice – practice that I entirely support. I accept the argument, promoted by t

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

Shuffling to some purpose – or just fancy footwork?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

Spare a thought if you will for the hard pressed people who have to update government information. Well into 2018, for...

Life support for the NHS

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

To outline a comprehensive remedy for the ongoing and worsening woes of the beleaguered NHS would take a little more...

A flight of festive fancy

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Christmas Past: It’s cold outside but inside the care home the star atop the tree beams its rays of hope...