Why Parliament should not extend the Human Rights Act to private care homes

Posted on March 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

By PETER GROSE, partner, Lester Aldridge Solictors

Much has been written since June when the House of Lords made their decision in YL v Birmingham City Council & Others that private care home providers are not public authorities and therefore not subject to the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA). The judgment has been misinterpreted by a number of writers as indicating that the frail and vulnerable do not have Human Rights.

Private Eye, echoing some of the leading charities for elderly people, stated in a recent issue “Indeed, prisoners are now better protected by the law than pensioners in priv

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

New liberty rules – a breath of fresh air?

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Good news that the Government intends to replace the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) with a system to be called...

Now where did I put those spectacles?

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week, guest blogger John Burton touched on the management of dentures in care homes and used an extended toothy...

Missing teeth

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

I know it’s an obsessional bad habit, but I watch the CQC Public Board Meetings every month. I believe that...