Why Parliament should not extend the Human Rights Act to private care homes

Posted on March 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

By PETER GROSE, partner, Lester Aldridge Solictors

Much has been written since June when the House of Lords made their decision in YL v Birmingham City Council & Others that private care home providers are not public authorities and therefore not subject to the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA). The judgment has been misinterpreted by a number of writers as indicating that the frail and vulnerable do not have Human Rights.

Private Eye, echoing some of the leading charities for elderly people, stated in a recent issue “Indeed, prisoners are now better protected by the law than pensioners in priv

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

Extracare – the next best solution?

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Academics at Newcastle University say that an average of almost nine thousand more care home beds will be needed each...

Care homes discounted in end of life care

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

I am sure that we all want those who we care for to experience ‘a good death’ when the time...

Perhaps I’m ‘app’athetic

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

I’ve got an app in my toolbox that allows me to bang-in nails – I call it a hammer. I’ve...