A single view of quality

Posted on February 8th, by geoff in CT blog. 2 comments

By Caring Times editor Geoff Hodgson

“Quality in a service or product is not what you put into it. It is what the client or customer gets out of it.” – Peter Drucker

“You can’t inspect quality into a care home.” – Chris Vellenoweth, former head of of the former National Association of Inspection and Regulation Officers (NAIRO)

In its current consultation document Shaping the future, the Care Quality Commission, in setting out its vision for the future regulation of health and social care, includes among its seven main themes, its wish to implement a single view of quality – a single shared system of measurement that supports providers to easily monitor their own quality and share information about their performance.

I don’t think it’s going to manage this. ‘Quality’, is just as hard to pin down as other abstract nouns such as ‘love’ and ‘morality’. Quality is very hard to measure; for example, a care worker may have no formal qualifications but deliver excellent care for all that, and it works the other way as well.

Perhaps CQC should lower its sights and go for a commonly recognised set of measurable standards (National Minimum Standards?) which will create the conditions in which high quality care has the best chance of thriving. It has been shown to be difficult enough to achieve consensus on minimum standards without muddying the waters by bringing ‘quality’ (which is essentially perceptual and experiential) into the debate.

  • The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.

2 responses to “A single view of quality”

  1. QUALITY ALWAYS SELLS is as true as true can get. However, to produce a quality product or service one has to decline to be beaten down on price by dutch auctions.

  2. John Burton says:

    Add this to Drucker’s quality quote: “There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all,” and we have a summary of why CQC can never work for residents of care homes and the public. But this useless, expensive, and destructive bureaucracy continues with the grudging toleration of the majority of the social care Establishment. Why?

Latest blog posts

Look East old chap

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

A certain amount of self-regard is no bad thing, but I can’t say the same about those, usually younger, people...

The flowers that bloom in the Spring

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

We spent the long weekend just gone mainly in our garden and on our allotment, planting, pruning, weeding, watering and...

Running to stand still

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week, in giving evidence to the – wait for it – Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee and the...