Dual registration – a death knell


Posted on January 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

|To increase occupancy, many nursing home owners have considered registering beds for residential care. Ian Holden argues that, under present trading conditions, dual registration is likely to be a recipe for failure.| In my last article (CT, January 2001) I demonstrated the levels at which a typical 40-bed nursing home would have needed to trade in the year 1999-2000 to survive in the long term. It became clear that if average fees had been below £340 per week, survival became very difficult unless average occupancies exceeded 85%. It also explained the difficulties which had arisen where NHP had entered into sale and leaseback arrangements: reflecting a 10.8% return on a notional capital investment of £1.2 million. It follows that the typical dual registered home or “single care home”, with an assumed spilt of 50/50 nursing/residential beds, is unsustainable in future ­ given the staffing requirements demanded by registering authorities, and assuming a substantial proportion of state-aided patients. Even





Comments are closed.


Latest blog posts

Time for a ten dollar answer

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Ernest Hemingway was known for his minimalist style and he used to pooh-pooh what he called “ten-dollar” words. Not to...

Lacking capacity

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

A friend of mine diagnosed with cancer – now, happily, treated – was asked how he could possibly have missed the...

Care homes – understated examples of tasteful design

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Dozens of recently-built care homes are material proof that it is perfectly possible to design aesthetically pleasing buildings and put...