It ain’t necessarily so – a call for a change of heart from government

Posted on July 1st, by editor in Caring Times. No Comments

For the last couple of decades, during both Conservative and Labour governments, care homes have been subject to an endless quest for certainty. Politicians, policy makers and senior managers use the word “ensure” when what they really mean is “we’ll try to make it happen”. The belief is that bad practice can be eliminated by edicts and rules, and that good practice can be prescribed by policy. A care home is a living organism – a “social ecology” – made up of people and their complex, unpredictable and changing interactions (relationships) and a building with its furniture and equipment. Homes flourish when the conditions for growth and survival are right; they can’t be made to work well. The home exists within, as part of, and dependent on, the wider community. Care homes serve a purpose for society; without them, there would be social breakdown. Since its inception, the Welfare State has depended on the existence of care homes. On the face of it, the idea of a care home is a good one. At various points in

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

The NHS and all that jazz

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week the National Health Service marked its 70th anniversary. The irony is that, when this all too human institution...

The bland leaving the bland?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The headline for an interview which Sir David Behan, the Care Quality Commission’s departing chief executive, gave to The Guardian...

IT comes to CQC

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

This month, IT is coming to CQC in person. David Behan is leaving, and DB’s replacement is IT, Ian Trenholm...