Lifting the lid on pension pots – implications for future funding of care

Posted on April 7th, by geoff in CT blog. 1 Comment

By Caring Times editor Geoff Hodgson

A conservatory, a car, a cruise, a celebrity style wedding, a care plan – these might be some spending choices facing people who this week find they suddenly have access to their pension pots. It is easy to understand why people who have been mis-sold pensions or whose funds have been poorly managed would want to take control of their own money. It is also easy to understand why a government might enjoy some of the immediate tax revenue that such a policy could bring to it.

What is less clear is whether or not this freed up money has implications for the care sector. It seems to boil down to three questions: if people did choose to purchase care plans, is the market in a position to offer enough of these? If the guidance offered by the Department of Work and Pensions is pointing enquirers in the direction of independent financial advice, will a sufficient number of these advisers have knowledge of what care packages might be available? Finally (and most significantly) will anyone want to spend their funds on something as seemingly unappealing if the alternatives are paying off a mortgage, taking a well deserved holiday or helping a child with a deposit for a house?

Looming large beyond these questions is the big one. Thirty years down the line might older people have less of their own money left to contribute to care costs? If this is so, who will pick up the tab? I am not suggesting that profligate pensioners awash with champagne will deliberately ignore the future, but today’s problems will inevitably press harder than tomorrow’s plans for many people.

  • The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.

One response to “Lifting the lid on pension pots – implications for future funding of care”

  1. This move to own-choice pension use seems, to me at least, to hint towards a government expectation of (indeed drive towards) most people working longer before retiring. Apart from the exceedingly wealthy (good luck to them), who can realistically expect to be 25yrs in education, 25 years in work and 25 years+ (self-funded) retired? A long retirement is a recently found possibility, as most used to anticipate maybe 3-5 years. Hence the necessary demise of final salary schemes, due to simple unaffordability. That’s the realism as I see it and it is, for most people, probably the only way to be able to incorporate some end-of-days care plan and retain some house equity until the end.

Latest blog posts

The NHS and all that jazz

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week the National Health Service marked its 70th anniversary. The irony is that, when this all too human institution...

The bland leaving the bland?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The headline for an interview which Sir David Behan, the Care Quality Commission’s departing chief executive, gave to The Guardian...

IT comes to CQC

By guest blogger JOHN BURTON

This month, IT is coming to CQC in person. David Behan is leaving, and DB’s replacement is IT, Ian Trenholm...