Social care will need extra funding to meeting Living Wage costs, says independent think tank

Posted on July 27th, by geoff in Caring Times. Comments Off on Social care will need extra funding to meeting Living Wage costs, says independent think tank

Caring Times Latest

More than 700,000 care workers will benefit from the new ‘National Living Wage’ but social care will require extra funding to pay for it, says independent think-tank the Resolution Foundation.

The Foundation – which earlier this year called for and costed a plan to make social care a living wage sector – welcomes the new ‘premium’ minimum wage, which should make a big difference to low-paid care workers but says it will require significant new public investment in the social care sector, which has a very high proportion of low-paid staff and limited scope to absorb the higher wage costs through rising productivity.

Rising demand for care will also increase the pressure on staffing and wage costs. The analysis finds that the cost of meeting expected rises in the National Minimum Wage were already estimated to cost around a £1bn by 2020, a figure that will could double to £2.3bn with the new premium minimum wage (the so called National Living Wage) for workers aged 25 and over. However, savings to the exchequer via offsetting reductions to in-work support should significantly lower this figure.

This extra funding will need to be found amidst deep spending cuts in local government, which funds social care. The Foundation estimates that on average non-protected departments will face spending cuts of around 16% by 2020, relative to their funding in 2010, and cuts to local government are likely to be significantly higher.

The Foundation notes that there are considerable fiscal benefits to raising pay in social care, as well as the huge benefits to staff and their patients. It estimates that up to half of the gross public costs of raising pay in social care will be returned to the Treasury through higher tax revenues and lower in-work support. This would bring the net public cost of implementing the new premium minimum wage in social care down to £1.2bn by the end of the Parliament.

Failure to fund the necessary investment in social care could lead to more employers failing to pay staff the legal minimum, says the Resolution Foundation. Earlier RF research has found that 160,000 workers were currently losing out on around £130m a year through failure to pay even the NMW. This figure could rise significantly without extra resources and big improvements in enforcement.

Laura Gardiner, senior policy analyst at the Resolution Foundation said the Foundation was urging the Government to act quickly in making a commitment to fund higher pay in social care, which could make a huge difference to millions of workers and the service they provide.

“It is unrealistic to expect councils to find this extra money given the scale of cuts they’re facing,” said Ms Gardiner.

“It is important therefore that central government steps up and commits to providing this vital investment in social care, which will give a major boost to staff and improve the quality of care.”

Comments are closed.

Latest blog posts

Dropping your bundle

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week I was approached by a law firm who wanted to submit an article on assisted dying, in the...

The NHS and all that jazz

By Caring Times editor GEOFF HODGSON

Last week the National Health Service marked its 70th anniversary. The irony is that, when this all too human institution...

The bland leaving the bland?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The headline for an interview which Sir David Behan, the Care Quality Commission’s departing chief executive, gave to The Guardian...